Radicalism during the English Revolution, 1641–1660: conversations with ChatGPT (part three)
Who were the Diggers?
The Diggers, also known as the True Levellers, were a group of radical political activists and religious sectarians who emerged during the English Civil War and the Interregnum. They were a small but vocal group who advocated for the abolition of private property and the establishment of a society based on communal ownership and control of land. They also advocated for religious toleration and the abolition of the traditional hierarchical structure of the Church of England.
The Diggers were led by Gerrard Winstanley, who was a religious visionary and social reformer. In 1649 they established a community on St. George’s Hill in Surrey, where they attempted to live and farm communally. Winstanley believed that the land belonged to all people and that it should be used for the common benefit, rather than being owned by a small group of wealthy landowners. So he and his followers established a number of small communities on common land.
The Diggers were not well received by the local landowners and they were met with resistance and repression. They were also at odds with other groups within the Leveller movement, which sought to expand the franchise and increase political representation rather than abolish private property. Despite this, Winstanley continued to advocate for his ideas through pamphlets and books. The Diggers’ ideas were seen as radical and were not widely supported at the time. But they had a significant impact on the political and social changes that occurred during the English Revolution. They are seen as an early example of a movement advocating for communal living and common ownership; social and economic equality for all; and the redistribution of wealth and resources
Can you tell me more about Gerrard Winstanley, his life and ideas?
Gerrard Winstanley was the leader of the Diggers, also known as the True Levellers. Winstanley was born in the early 17th century in Lancashire, England. He was a religious seeker who was critical of the traditional religious institutions and the social and economic inequalities of his time.
The community was short-lived as it was met with resistance and repression from the local landowners, who saw the Diggers as a threat to their property and social order. Winstanley and his followers were evicted from their land, and many of them were arrested and imprisoned. Despite this, Winstanley continued to advocate for his ideas in a series of pamphlets and books, such as “The New Law of Righteousness” and “The Law of Freedom”.
Some conversation follows regarding the beginning of Digger activities in Surrey on a Sunday
It is important to note that the Diggers’ decision to establish their community on a Sunday was a deliberate act of defiance against the traditional laws and customs of the time. In 17th century England, Sunday was considered a holy day and was set aside for religious observance and rest. The Diggers, however, saw the traditional observance of the Sabbath as a form of oppression and they believed that the land should be worked and shared by all people on all days.
What about Winstanley’s conversion to Quakerism?
Gerrard Winstanley was a convert to Quakerism. His beliefs and practices as a Digger were deeply influenced by his religious convictions and after the Digger movement waned, he continued to be active in religious causes. Like John Lilburne, he believed in the inner light and the ability of each individual to access the divine within themselves, and he found these ideas aligned with the Quakers’ beliefs.
Who were the Fifth Monarchists?
The Fifth Monarchists were a millenarian sect that emerged during the English Revolution. They believed that the end of the world was near and that Jesus Christ would soon establish a new kingdom on earth. They believed that the current political and social order was corrupt and that it needed to be replaced by a new one that was based on biblical principles.
The Fifth Monarchists took their name from a passage in the Book of Daniel, which speaks of four monarchies that will rule the world before the coming of the “everlasting kingdom” of the “fifth monarchy”. They believed that the fifth monarchy was a religious kingdom that would be established by Jesus Christ and that it would bring about the end of the world.
The Fifth Monarchists were active in the political and social changes that occurred during the English Revolution and they were known for their radical ideas. They called for the overthrow of the monarchy, the establishment of a republic, and the implementation of a theocratic government based on biblical principles. They also advocated for social and economic equality and the redistribution of wealth and resources.
They were a part of the millenarian movement, which saw the turmoil and changes of the time as signs of the approaching end of the world, and believed that their movement was a part of the divine plan for the end times. They believed that the end of the world was near and that their movement was a precursor to the coming of the kingdom of Jesus Christ.
The Fifth Monarchists were not a large or powerful group, and their beliefs and ideas were not widely accepted or supported. However, they played an important role in the political and social changes that occurred during the English Revolution, and their ideas were influential in shaping the political and religious landscape of the time.
Can you say something more about the Fifth Monarchist leaders?
One of the most prominent leaders of the Fifth Monarchists was Thomas Venner. He was a cooper and a member of the congregation of the Independent minister Praise-God Barebone. He led a group of Fifth Monarchists in an armed uprising in London in January 1661, known as Venner’s Revolt, which aimed to overthrow the newly restored monarchy of Charles II. The rebellion was quickly suppressed by the government forces and Venner was captured and executed. There were also other uprisings and revolts, such as the rising of the Fifth Monarchy Men in 1657, which was led by a man named John Reynolds.
It’s worth noting that these leaders, who advocated for violent uprisings, were not representative of the majority of the Fifth Monarchists, who were a peaceful millenarian sect. Although the Fifth Monarchists were an important religious movement during the English revolution, their influence waned in the Restoration period, and the sect eventually faded away.
Who were the Ranters?
The Ranters were a religious movement that emerged in England in the mid-17th century during the Commonwealth period. They were known for their unorthodox and radical beliefs, which made them a target of criticism, persecution, and even repression. These beliefs included the idea that sin was impossible and that individuals could achieve a state of perfection and sinlessness. They were also known for their antinomianism, which means that they believed that they were above the law and that traditional moral and ethical codes did not apply to them. In addition, they were known for their unorthodox religious beliefs and practices, such as rejecting the authority of the Bible and promoting free love. The Ranters were considered to be a disruptive and heretical group by many of their contemporaries, and they were often at odds with the authorities and mainstream religious movements of the time.
The Ranters were not well organized, and were considered by many to be a loosely associated group of individuals who shared similar ideas and beliefs. It’s worth noting that the Ranters were not a monolithic group, and their beliefs and practices varied widely among different individuals and communities.
Did the Ranters have a leadership, and who were the most important Ranters?
Some of the most well-known figures associated with the Ranters include:
1. Abiezer Coppe: he was a radical preacher and pamphleteer who was active during the Commonwealth period. Coppe was considered to be one of the most influential Ranters of his time.
2. Laurence Clarkson: he was a former Quaker who became a Ranter and was known for his unorthodox religious beliefs and practices. He wrote several pamphlets and books.
3. John Robins: he was a radical preacher and pamphleteer.
4. William Walwyn: he was a radical pamphleteer who was active during the Commonwealth period. He was known for his unorthodox religious beliefs and practices.
It’s worth noting that the Ranters were not a monolithic group, so these individuals, along with many others, had different and sometimes conflicting beliefs and practices. Their influence also varied over time and space.
After expressing my shock that the Leveller leader William Walwyn has been included in a list of well-known Ranters, and after making some minor corrections [Clarkson was never a Quaker but attacked them in print, while there is no evidence that Robins was a pamphleteer], we moved on to another question: who were the Quakers?
The early Quakers, also known as the Society of Friends, had a unique approach to leadership and organization. They did not have a hierarchical structure or a formal leadership system, and they believed that each individual had the ability to access the inner light, or the presence of God within them, and to lead themselves and others in spiritual matters.
That being said, there were some individuals who played a prominent role in the early Quaker movement, and who were recognized by their fellow Quakers as leaders or ministers. These individuals were known for their spiritual insight and their ability to convey Quaker beliefs and practices to others.
One of the most well-known leaders of the early Quakers was George Fox. He is considered the founder of the Quaker movement and he played a central role in its development. He travelled extensively throughout England, Scotland, and Ireland, preaching and spreading the Quaker message. He also wrote extensively on Quaker beliefs and practices, and his writings continue to be an important source of information on the early Quaker movement.
Another prominent leader of the early Quakers was Margaret Fell. She was a wealthy landowner who converted to Quakerism and became an important figure in the movement. She provided financial support for the Quakers and her home, Swarthmoor Hall, became a centre for Quaker activity. She also wrote extensively on Quaker beliefs and practices and was one of the first Quakers to publish a book in defence of the Quaker faith.
Other notable early Quaker leaders include James Nayler, Elizabeth Hooton, William Dewsbury, and Francis Howgill, each of whom played an important role in spreading the Quaker message and shaping the early Quaker movement.
It’s worth noting that these leaders were not considered to have any formal authority over the Quakers, and that their role was more of a spiritual guide rather than a formal leader. Quakers believed that the Inner light is the true guide for each person, and that everyone has the potential to be a leader in their own right.
What can you tell me about the Muggletonians?
The Muggletonians were a small Christian sect that emerged in the 17th century during the English Revolution. They were founded by Ludowick Muggleton and John Reeve, two men who claimed to be the last two prophets spoken of in the Bible.
The Muggletonians were known for their unique religious beliefs, which included the rejection of most traditional Christian beliefs and practices, such as the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus Christ. They believed that God was present only in the minds of individuals and that salvation came through knowledge, rather than faith or good works. They also rejected the authority of the Church of England and other religious institutions and denied the existence of an afterlife.
The Muggletonians were a small sect and they had a relatively limited following. Despite their small numbers, they had a significant impact on the religious and intellectual life of their time. They were known for their opposition to traditional religious institutions and their emphasis on personal spiritual experience. They also advocated for religious toleration, and they were an important part of the broader movement of religious dissent during the English Revolution.
It’s worth mentioning that the Muggletonians were not politically active, but focused more on their spiritual beliefs and practices. They had a strong emphasis on individual revelation and the rejection of traditional religious authority, and believed that the only way to know the truth was through direct revelation and inner light.
After remarking on what appears to be some confusion between Muggletonian and Quaker teaching, we moved on to the English followers of Jacob Boehme. What can you tell me about them?
The followers of Jacob Boehme, also known as Behmenists, were a religious movement that emerged in England during the 17th century. They were inspired by the teachings of Jacob Boehme, a German mystic and theologian who lived in the late 16th and early 17th centuries.
Boehme’s teachings were based on the idea of the “inner light”, a divine spark that exists within each individual and that can be accessed through contemplation and spiritual practice. He also emphasized the unity and interconnectedness of all things, and the idea that God is present in the natural world. He wrote extensively on the nature of God, the soul, and the universe, and his works were widely read by theologians, philosophers, and mystics of the time.
The followers of Boehme in England were deeply influenced by his teachings and they sought to apply his ideas to their own spiritual lives. They believed that Boehme’s teachings offered a deeper understanding of the nature of God and the soul, and that they provided a new way of understanding the world and one’s place in it. They also saw Boehme’s ideas as a way to reconcile science and religion, and to integrate the new scientific discoveries of the time with traditional religious beliefs.
Behmenists had a relatively small but dedicated following in England and they were part of the broader movement of religious dissent that emerged during the English Revolution. They were known for their emphasis on the inner light and direct spiritual experience, as well as their rejection of traditional religious authority.
It’s worth noting that Behmenists were not politically active, but focused more on their spiritual beliefs and practices, they believed that by understanding the spiritual nature of the world, they can have a better understanding of one’s place in it. They also believed that Boehme’s teachings provided a new way of understanding the world and the nature of God, and they sought to apply these ideas to their own spiritual lives.
After some criticism of this account of English Behmenists, as well as noting its similarity with the rather old – if still useful – work of the Quaker scholar Rufus Jones, we moved on to anti-Trinitarian beliefs. What can you tell me about Socinians, particularly during the English Revolution?
Socinianism was not a widely held belief in England, but there were a small number of individuals who were sympathetic to its ideas. The Socinian community in England was small and not well organized, and it did not have a significant impact on the political and religious discourse of the time.
Socinianism was considered a form of heresy by the Anglican Church, and its followers were often subject to persecution. Socinian ideas were not well accepted by the society of the time, and Socinianism was not a significant factor in the religious and political landscape of England during the English Revolution.
However, it’s worth noting that there were some individuals and groups who advocated for religious toleration and the separation of church and state during the English Revolution, and these ideas have some similarities with the ideas of Socinianism, which emphasized the importance of reason and personal religious experience.
Additionally, some of the individuals who were influential in the political and religious discourse of the time, like John Milton, were also sympathetic to some of the ideas of Socinianism.
Who were Paul Best and John Biddle?
Paul Best was an English minister and theologian. He was a member of the Socinian community in England and was known for his unorthodox religious beliefs and practices. He was a close friend of John Biddle and was involved in the translation and publication of several Socinian texts, including the Racovian Catechism.
John Biddle was an English theologian and minister as well as a major figure in the Socinian community in England. He is considered one of the most important figures of the Socinian movement in England. Biddle was a leading advocate of Socinian beliefs, which emphasized the importance of reason and personal religious experience. He was the author of several works, including “Twelve Arguments Drawn out of the Scriptures” (1655), which presented a Socinian interpretation of the Bible and was considered one of the most important works of Socinian theology of the time. Biddle was arrested several times for his unorthodox religious beliefs, and his works were banned and burned. He was also imprisoned for his beliefs.
Finally, who were the most significant English Republican theorists during the seventeenth century?
Some of the most important Republican theorists and advocates during this period include:
1. James Harrington: he was an English political theorist who wrote the influential work “The Commonwealth of Oceana” (1656) in which he advocated for a republic based on property ownership and the rotation of political offices.
2. Algernon Sidney: he was an English politician and political theorist who wrote “Discourses Concerning Government” (1698) in which he advocated for a republic based on the principles of classical republicanism. He was also an advocate of civil liberties and religious toleration.
3. Henry Neville: he was an English political theorist and writer who wrote “The Isle of Pines” (1668) in which he advocated for a republic based on the principles of civic virtue, civic duty, and the common good. He also advocated for religious toleration and the separation of church and state.
4. Marchamont Nedham: he was an English journalist and political theorist who wrote “The Excellencie of a Free State” (1656).
What about John Milton?
John Milton was an English poet, polemicist, and political theorist who lived during the English Revolution. He is considered to be one of the most important figures of the period, and his works had a significant impact on the political discourse of the time. Some of Milton’s most important republican works include:
1. “Areopagitica” (1644): this is a powerful defence of freedom of speech and the press, in which Milton argues for the importance of open and free debate in a republic.
2. “The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates” (1649): this work, written shortly after the execution of King Charles I, defends the right of the people to depose a tyrant and to establish a republic.
3. “Eikonoklastes” (1649): this work is a response to the Eikon Basilike, a book purporting to be Charles I’s spiritual autobiography, in which Milton defends the execution of Charles I and argues for the necessity of a republic.
4. “The Ready and Easy Way to Establish a Free Commonwealth” (1660): this work, written after the restoration of Charles II, presents a plan for the establishment of a republic in England and advocates for the separation of church and state.
5. “The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce” (1643): this work, written before the English Revolution, advocates for the freedom of marriage and divorce, and argues that the state should not have control over the institution of marriage
It’s worth noting that Milton’s works, particularly “Areopagitica” and “The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates” are considered as some of the most important works on republicanism and freedom of speech and press, and still widely read and studied today. His ideas, particularly his republicanism and his advocacy of freedom of speech, have had a lasting impact on political thought and continue to be studied and debated.
After pointing out some errors in the statements above (particularly with regard to chronology), we concluded our discussions with some of questions about what ChatGPT might ‘know’ in the future and what implications this might have for academic disciplines such as History. I’ll deal with these in the fourth and final part of this series.
.